The Oct. 16 report in The Washington Post that Turkish intelligence blew the cover on an Israeli spy ring in Iran and exposed it to the local authorities is just the tip of a big, evil iceberg that looms over Israel and Turkey’s defense establishments. For dozens of years, Israel and Turkey, like close allies, cooperated in all areas of intelligence and security. Intelligence cooperation was close-knit and accurate. There was great trust between the parties, which yielded many mutually beneficial fruits. No more. The conciliation between Israel and Turkey, which was brokered by US President Barack Obama after immense efforts, is merely a veneer. In essence, there is no change.
High-ranking Israeli security officials contend that the 45-year-old Hakan Fidan, who used to serve as special assistant to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is a radical Islamist who maintains very close ties with Iran. His appointment as chief of intelligence was a watershed that marked Erdogan and his party’s full seizure of the country’s defense establishment. At first, Israel was unaware of this appointment. It was only in the wake of the Mavi Marmara flotilla events in 2010 that its intelligence services became aware of the fact that Fidan was heading Turkey’s intelligence services. Until that point, the working assumption in Israel was that Turkey’s intelligence and military remained independent and that a certain degree of cooperation could be maintained, even when Ankara was being hostile or standoffish.
That’s precisely what happened after the Muslim Brotherhood rose to power in Egypt, where the formula actually worked. Egypt’s intelligence agencies continued to cooperate with their Israeli counterparts, and with greater force yet following the tacit agreement of the now-ousted Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi and his associates in Cairo.
In Ankara, it turns out, things are done completely differently. Erdogan enhanced his grip on power, carrying out a massive purge of the military by sending dozens of generals to prison and not hesitating to appoint a close Islamist associate as chief of intelligence. According to Israeli sources, the Mavi Marmara flotilla events unearthed the deep schism. Almost instantaneously, Israel realized that it had lost Turkey. Things will never be the same again.
It is hard to believe that it was just a few years ago that Israeli and Turkish generals could have held intimate tête-à-tête consultations and even gossiped about their leaders. One of Israel’s former air force commanders received a perk from his Turkish counterpart by getting a “peek flight” along the Turkish-Iranian border. Another retired Israeli general told me last week about his productive working visits to Istanbul and Ankara, after which he would be hosted by his Turkish counterpart. The latter would take him sailing on a luxury yacht on the Bosporus. He would whisper a secret or two in his ear, perhaps even gossip about Turkey’s senior leadership and the independence of the Turkish military as the “guardian of democracy and the constitution” in accordance with the spirit of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, deemed the founding father of the modern Turkish nation.
Since then, Turkish Kemalism has been waning and has been on the defensive. Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) grip on Ankara is tighter than it has ever been. The Turkish prime minister has engendered impressive economic growth, improving the quality of life for the masses. He has also learned the lesson from his predecessors who were vanquished under the boots of the military. Now he — and nobody else — is in control. The generals are either in prison or have gone underground or been tamed and put in their proper place.
Having received the message loud and clear, Israel improved its relations with Greece and Cyprus, preparing other alternatives, despite the fact that in quite a few areas Turkey remains irreplaceable. It shares a long border with Syria, Iraq and Iran. This is a strategic asset of the first order. It also has efficient intelligence services, a huge army and large air and naval forces. Israel was a major supplier of technology, military materiel, weaponry and much more. It upgraded Turkish tanks and other weaponry systems. Most of these collaborations are long gone. What we have is a huge pool of bad blood.
The reported event where an Israeli spy ring operating in Iran was exposed to Iranian authorities probably did take place. Official Israel, notwithstanding, maintains a roaring silence.
Either way, this marks a serious intelligence setback for Israel and the West’s efforts to gather information from deep inside Iran’s nuclear project. According to Western intelligence sources, Fidan and Tehran make a perfect match. Some of them even joke that “Fidan has long been on Iran’s payroll. He is the Iranians’ long-term investment, which now bears many fruits.”
Despite all this, if the report is correct, blowing the cover on an active spy ring and exposing it to Iran, cold-bloodedly, is considered in Israel to be a scathing transgression of a red line. Even the Americans, who were aware of the incident, viewed this as a severe violation of international codes between friendly nations.
Ankara emphatically denies the incident via various spokespersons (chief among them Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.) So who leaked this story precisely at this time? There’s no telling, but we can surmise: It’s either Israel or the United States.
It is against this backdrop that the Israelis who were opposed to conciliation with Turkey find it hard to conceal their broad smirk. Israeli Defense Minister Moshe (Bogie) Ya’alon was one of the opponents to conciliation in his previous capacity. Now, as defense minister, he is all for it. The only one who remains consistent in his objection is former Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman.
“Turkey has proven,” Liberman says in closed forums, “that it had no intention of reaching conciliation. The Turks don’t want conciliation. All they want is to bring Israel down to its knees. They cooperate fully with the Iranians and have an Islamic agenda. We simply played into their hands. We paid dearly and got nothing in return.”
An antisemitic flyer found on the University of Houston campus on Tuesday. Photo: Michael Leone / Facebook
Dozens of flyers and stickers promoting neo-Nazi propaganda were found at the University of Houston (UH) this week, the latest incident associated with an increase in white supremacist activity on campuses nationwide.
The flyers, found on bulletin boards, walls, trash bins, and lamp posts at the university’s main campus on Tuesday, included phrases such as, “Beware the International Jew” and “Imagine a Muslim-Free America,” according to a statement shared online by UH’s chapter of the Young Communist League (YCL).
IDF soldiers make a blessing on the traditional Jewish custom of apple and honey to welcome Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year. (ChameleonsEye / Shutterstock.com)
The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (The Fellowship) and Friends of the Israel Defense Forces (FIDF) said they will provide $1.5 million in annual Rosh Hashanah “Fellowship Gift Cards” to 12,000 IDF soldiers marking the upcoming Jewish New Year.
The initiative, coordinated in collaboration with the Association for the Wellbeing of Israel’s Soldiers and the LIBI Fund, will provide more than 10,000 lone soldiers and soldiers $140 gift cards. Another 2,200 soldiers will receive gift cards worth $100.
The cards “will allow the soldiers to celebrate the New Year without the burden of financial stress,” the organizations said in a statement Wednesday.
Gaza-based terror group says it will agree to Palestinian Authority conditions on forming joint government and holding elections
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, center, and spokesman Fawzi Barhoum attend a protest in Gaza City on July 22, 2017, against new Israeli security measures implemented at the holy site, which include metal detectors and cameras, following an attack that killed two Israeli policemen the previous week. (AFP/Mohammed Abed)
For the past week or so, Iranian official media and social networks have been abuzz with anecdotes woven around a football match in Tehran between Iran and Syria and the light it might shed on a complicated relationship.
According to most accounts, a group of Syrians flown in by special charter to cheer their national squad in its bid for a place in the World Cup in Moscow staged an anti-Iran demonstration in the stadium. The Syrian contingent included young ladies who refused to wear the Iranian-style hijab.
Their presence in the stadium highlighted the fact that no Iranian woman is allowed to attend a football match after a fatwa by the “Supreme Guide” that women watching young men running around with bare legs might cause “undue excitement”
An Orthodox man passes a British guard in London, UK. (drserg / Shutterstock.com)
A new in-depth survey conducted by the U.K.-based Institute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR) found that around 30 percent of the British public hold at least one anti-Semitic viewpoint.
The report noted, however, that most of the 30 percent polled also held some positive views about Jews.
Further, around 15 percent of the British public indicated they agreed with two or more anti-Semitic views presented to them, while two percent of British adults polled were found to be “hard-core” anti-Semites.
The survey was conducted by JPR senior research fellow Dr. Daniel Staetsky using face-to-face interviews and online polls.
That’s followed by the sounds of the terrorists assaulting a passenger.
“Please don’t hurt me,” he pleads. “Oh God.”
As the passengers rush the cabin, a Muslim terrorist proclaims, “In the name of Allah.”
As New York firefighters struggle up the South Tower with 100 pounds of equipment on their backs trying to save lives until the very last moment, the Flight 93 passengers push toward the cockpit. The Islamic hijackers call out, “Allahu Akbar.”.
The autumn of 2015 was unusual in almost every way on the north Aegean Greek island of Lesbos from which I am writing. There were tens of thousands of illegal migrants on the island, the native population of which was scarcely 100,000. New refugees arrived every day by the thousands.
One evening, the blue-gray sky grumbled shortly after sunset. The thick clouds blackened and rain poured down over the city with a roar. As I ran across the slippery pavement into a friend’s bar, I heard a group of five poor souls speaking Persian with a Turkic accent and running amok, seeking shelter under the eaves of a building.
While the criminal investigation is closing in on one associate after another, one advisor after another, in one of the most serious affairs in the State of Israel’s history, and perhaps the most serious affair, I find it hard to believe that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was driven by greed when he advanced the submarine deal.
There are doubts. There are associates being questioned one after the other. There are state’s witnesses. Nevertheless, Netanyahu likely wasn’t a partner in crime. He didn’t make decisions on the submarines in a bid to make a profit for himself or for his associates. It’s impossible, just impossible.
Regarding the question that forms the title of this article, I truly believe that the answer is “yes.” It is my belief that Christian Zionism is as obvious a sign of the beginning of the redemption of Israel as are the ingathering of millions of Jews to the land of Israel and the existence of the State of Israel itself. But there are many people who don’t share this perspective.
In the Jewish community, there are still many who are wary of Christian friendship and support. Many Jews are suspicious of an ulterior motive to convert Jews to Christianity that they fear underlies this political partnership.
Last weekend, the world experienced a petrifying “wake up call” when Pyongyang test launched a hydrogen bomb. According to Yukiya Amano, director of the International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA), Sunday’s test represents “a new dimension to the threat.” Added Amano, “I think the North Korean threat is a global one now.
In the past, people thought it was a regional one, but that is no longer the case.”
Since 1994, when North Korea decided to pull out of the Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), there has been a huge history of attempts to chain the North Korean nuclear beast, including efforts for military cooperation, sanctions and, of course, negotiations.