Some Israeli researchers and politicians are critical of a decision by the Hebrew University to teach more classes in English, but administrators believe such a switch is necessary to maintain the institutions status.
The Law School at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, seen in a picture uploaded Oct. 25, 2018.
Albert Einstein, the greatest of Jewish scientists, came to speak at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1923, when it consisted of but a single building on Mt. Scopus and hadn’t officially opened. Einstein was to speak on the theory of relativity, and he wanted to do so in French, but some of the lecturers as well as activists for the Hebrew language protested. Einstein acceded, opened with greetings in Hebrew, and then apologized before announcing that the scientific lecture would have to be delivered in French. Ninety-five years later, a similar conflict has resurfaced at the leading university in Israel.
At various meetings and conferences, Hebrew University President Asher Cohen has said that the emphasis during his tenure would be on internationalism, on boosting student exchange programs, receiving faculty from abroad and sending Israeli faculty to universities in other countries. In conjunction with this focus, the university administration would be examining the possibility of transitioning to instruction in English for courses toward advanced degrees, master’s degrees and doctoral studies in the sciences, as well as adding one or two required courses in English for a bachelor’s degree.
Reports about such a move have drawn sharp criticism, especially on the political front, and not only from the nationalist right. To wit, Knesset member Ofer Shelach, from the centrist Yesh Atid, wrote that it is ridiculous that for the sake of international status and the desire to attract foreign students, the university would take a step to reverse 150 years of Zionism and the essence of a free people in its land. Further, he threatened that if the university failed to abandon the idea, the political establishment would have to “cause it to reverse it.”
Yaakov Haguel, deputy chairman of the World Zionist Organization, wrote in a sharply worded letter to Cohen, “The reviver of the Hebrew language, Eliezer Ben Yehuda, would certainly turn in his grave in light of this insane decision.” In conversations with Al-Monitor, university lecturers who spoke on the condition of anonymity also called the decision into question.
One lecturer warned that it is impossible to disconnect bachelor’s degrees from advanced studies because the lecturers are the same. A switch in language would therefore marginalize those who are not fluent in English and favor those who are. According to him, it appears that the university is acting based on economic reasoning, because foreign students pay higher tuition.
Another lecturer complained that the move would disconnect the university from Israeli society. He argued that if researchers are instructed to write articles in English only, their studies will likely be geared toward foreign journals only. This would create a situation where studies in Israel would no longer touch on what’s happening in Israel, because it wouldn’t interest the editors of those journals. “Who,” he asked, “would be left to study Israeli society or Judaism?”
Another critique touches on the exclusion of students whose English-language skills are not strong. Yuval Elbashan, dean of the law school at Ono Academic College, argues, “For children of professors, who spent their sabbaticals abroad and are fluent in English, perhaps it wouldn’t make a difference, but for students who come from disadvantaged populations, language could be an insurmountable obstacle. Thus, the academy would once again become the playground of only one group in Israeli society, which is dangerous in itself.”
By disadvantaged populations, Elbashan meant students who struggle to learn English as well as ultra-Orthodox students, who hardly learn any English in their educational systems, as they do not follow the national core studies curriculum. Arab students are another vulnerable group because the level of English instruction is uneven among the schools they attend.
According to one of the lecturers, the ideological critique is the strongest. He remarked that Hebrew University was born out of the struggle for the establishment of Israel as a Hebrew state, much like the Hebrew Academy and the revival of the Hebrew language. Replacing Hebrew with English would lead to a reversal, disconnecting the academy from Israeli society and language. The lecturer also noted that the issue has a political dimension. The international emphasis comes at the expense of Israeliness and parallels a universalist approach that pushes nationalism aside.
Barak Medina, the rector of Hebrew University, told Al-Monitor that alongside a commitment to research and instruction in Hebrew, the university administration recognizes the importance of advancing the international standing of the university, and that in order to do so it is necessary to increase the number of excellent foreign students and to continue receiving leading faculty from abroad.
According to Medina, studies for a bachelor’s degree will by and large continue to be taught in Hebrew. Certain courses in the social studies and humanities that do not have a significant local component are already taught in English, and the university plans to add a few more courses in English to these. At the same time, instruction for master’s degree studies in the exact sciences will mostly be in English, Medina said. This is already the case in agriculture studies and the dentistry schools and will be applied to the rest of the natural sciences.
The university’s position stems from the fact that in the global academic environment, Hebrew, like most other languages, is nearly irrelevant except in specific fields — in the case of Hebrew, in Bible, Talmud and Israel studies. For Hebrew University to maintain its position as the top-ranked institution in Israel and one of the best in the world, as per the Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings, Israeli researchers must retain their prominence in research internationally, not only in Israel. This is the only way to draw top researchers to Israel and to enrich the Israeli academy.
Hebrew University also competes with other institutions in Israel, like the Weitzman Institute for Science, which grants advanced degrees and instructs primarily in English. Even today, in most Israeli labs involved in the natural sciences, research is conducted in English. These labs attract doctoral students and researchers from abroad to conduct postdoctoral research.
Most prominent universities in Scandinavia, Belgium and Holland teach primarily in English, and this has contributed to the broad presence of researchers from these countries in all fields of academic research, where English is the common, professional language. France is an exception in not adopting English for higher education and academic research, and according to advocates for switching to English, the status of French scientists has declined over time, especially in the social sciences.
The question is whether Israelis want to be separatist, like the French, or internationalist, like the northern Europeans, and whether national pride in Hebrew is more important than the level of research at Hebrew University. Maybe Einstein took the best approach when he began his speech in Hebrew, and when he got to the theory of relativity, switched to the then-common scientific language, French. That is, adopt English where it is necessary as an international language for study and research but continue to use Hebrew as the primary language in all other courses and programs of study.
Menachem Begin in December 1942 wearing the Polish Army uniform of Gen. Anders’ forces with his wife Aliza and David Yutan; (back row) Moshe Stein and Israel Epstein
(photo credit: JABOTINSKY ARCHIVES)
During the inauguration of a memorial to the victims of the Siege of Leningrad in Jerusalem’s Sacher Park on January 24, 2020, before the climax of Holocaust remembrance events at which Russian President Vladimir Putin was given a central platform, we were stunned to hear a rendition of The Blue Kerchief (Siniy
Giant figures are seen during the 87th carnival parade of Aalst February 15, 2015
The annual carnival in Aalst, Belgium, is expected to take place on Sunday with even more antisemitic elements than in previous years.
Aalst’s organizers have sold hundreds of “rabbi kits” for revelers to dress as hassidic Jews in the carnival’s parade. The kit includes oversized noses, sidelocks (peyot) and black hats. The organizers plan to bring back floats similar to the one displayed in 2019 featuring oversized dolls of Jews, with rats on their shoulders, holding banknotes.
Pope Francis waves as he arrives at the Basilica of Saint Nicholas in the southern Italian coastal city of Bari, Italy February 23, 2020. Photo: REUTERS/Remo Casilli.
Pope Francis on Sunday warned against “inequitable solutions” to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, saying they would only be a prelude to new crises, in an apparent reference to US President Donald Trump’s Middle East peace proposal.
Francis made his comments in the southern Italian port city of Bari, where he traveled to conclude a meeting of bishops from all countries in the Mediterranean basin.
Palestinians walk past a shop selling fruits in Ramallah, Feb. 20, 2020. Photo: Reuters / Mohamad Torokman.
Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) have reached an agreement to end a five-month long trade dispute, officials said on Thursday.
The dispute, which opened a new front in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, began in September when the PA announced a boycott of Israel calves. The PA exercises limited self-rule in the West Bank under interim peace deals.
Antisemitic caricatures on display at the annual carnival in Aalst, Belgium. Photo: Raphael Ahren via Twitter.
Disturbing images emerged on Sunday of the annual carnival at Aalst, Belgium, showing an astounding number of antisemitic themes, costumes, displays and statements.
Israeli journalist Raphael Ahren documented people dressed as caricatures of Orthodox Jews, a fake “wailing wall” attacking critics of the parade, blatantly antisemitic characters and puppets wearing traditional Jewish clothes and sporting huge noses.
The stench of anti-Semitism always hovers over Switzerland’s Lake Geneva when the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is meeting there. The foul emanations reached a new nadir last week with UNHRC’s publication of a “database” of companies doing business in the disputed territories in Israel.
Following the publication of the list, Bruno Stagno Ugarte, deputy director for advocacy of NGO Human Rights Watch, stated, “The long-awaited release of the U.N. settlement business database should put all companies on notice: To do business with illegal settlements [sic] is to aid in the commission of war crimes.”
One of the many things that annoys me about politicians is how sure they are of themselves. Everything is black and white. Every idea is good or bad. Take globalism, for example. You either love it or hate it. It works or it doesn’t.
Another thing that annoys me is how so much of a politician’s life revolves around power: Do everything you can to get it, and everything you can to keep it.
Why am I ranting? Because, while our politicians have been consumed with power and the media with the fights over power, a threat to our nation has been virtually ignored.
Blue and White Party leaders Benny Gantz and Yair Lapid are establishing their diplomatic credentials in the immediate run-up to Israel’s March 2 election with an insult to a U.S. administration that has arguably provided Israel with more diplomatic gains than any previous administration.
The Times of Israel reported that at a campaign stop in front of English-speaking Israelis, Gantz accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “of neglecting bipartisan ties in favor of exclusive support from U.S. President Donald Trump’s Republican Party,” under the headline “Gantz pledges to mend ties with U.S. Democrats if elected.”
Bipartisanship was in short supply at the State of the Union address earlier this month—with one notable exception.
Nancy Pelosi had been looking dyspeptic, shuffling the papers she would later rip to shreds, when President Donald Trump reminded his audience that “the United States is leading a 59-nation diplomatic coalition against the socialist dictator of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro.”
Suddenly, the House Speaker applauded. Trump then introduced “the true and legitimate president of Venezuela: Juan Guaidó.”
The law professor Alan Dershowitz has thrown a legal hand-grenade into America’s political civil war by claiming to have evidence that former President Barack Obama “personally asked” the FBI to investigate someone “on behalf” of Obama’s “close ally,” billionaire financier George Soros.
He made his cryptic remark in an interview defending U.S. President Donald Trump against claims he interfered in the prosecution of his former adviser, Roger Stone.